Gut

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jørgensen, J R
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, S E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jørgensen, J R
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, S E
Gut 2002;51:76-81
© 2002 by Gut


COLON

Absorption and metabolism of octanoate by the rat colon in vivo: concentration dependency and influence of alternative fuels

J R Jørgensen1, M D Fitch2, P B Mortensen1, S E Fleming2

1 Department of Medicine CA 2121, Section of Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
2 Department of Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
S E Fleming, Department of Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3104, USA;
fleming{at}nature.berkeley.edu


ABSTRACT
Background: Compared with short and long chain fatty acids, medium chain fatty acids (MCFAs) have been shown to provide the highest colonic absorption of substrate carbon. Moreover, colonic epithelial cells fulfil their basic energy requirements as easily from MCFAs as from short chain fatty acids.

Aims: To further characterise octanoate as a colonic luminal substrate, we determined in vivo the influence of (i) substrate concentration and (ii) alternative luminal fuels, on rat colonic transport and metabolism.

Methods: Segments of rat proximal colon (8 cm) were cannulated and perfused for 100 min with 14C labelled octanoate. The right colic vein was also cannulated and venous blood analysed for total 14C, 14CO2, and metabolites by scintillation counting and high performance liquid chromatography.

Results: Tracer appearance in mesenteric blood stabilised after 20–40 minutes of perfusion. Increasing luminal octanoate concentrations from 2 to 40 mM resulted in linear increases in total carbon absorption. Maximum CO2 production was reached near 10 mM. A substantial proportion of octanoate was absorbed without being metabolised (59–94%). The luminal presence of a mixture of alternative fuels had no influence on either octanoate transport or metabolism.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated substantial concentration dependent colonic absorption of octanoate, rendering this MCFA a potential and much needed high energy substrate for patients with compromised small bowel function. Moreover, octanoate meets the basic energy requirements of colonic epithelial cells in vivo as well as butyrate. This study also demonstrates the divergence of in vitro and in vivo data regarding fatty acid absorption and metabolism in the colonic epithelium.


Keywords: energy; fat; medium chain triacylglycerol; medium chain fatty acids; short bowel syndrome; small bowel malabsorption

Abbreviations: acyl-CoA, acyl-Coenzyme A; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; Km, the Michaelis-Menten constant; MCFAs, medium chain fatty acids; LCT, long chain triacylglycerol; MCT, medium chain triacylglycerol; SCFAs, short chain fatty acids; Vmax, maximum reaction rate







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology