Gut

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nusko, G
Right arrow Articles by Hahn, E G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nusko, G
Right arrow Articles by Hahn, E G
Gut 2002;51:424-428
© 2002 by Gut


COLORECTAL CANCER

Risk related surveillance following colorectal polypectomy

G Nusko1, U Mansmann2, Th Kirchner3, E G Hahn1

1 Department of Medicine I, University of Erlangen, Germany
2 Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Germany
3 Department of Pathology, University of Erlangen, Germany

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr G Nusko, Department of Medicine I, University of Erlangen, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
gerhard.nusko{at}med1.imed.uni-erlangen.de


ABSTRACT
Background: Patients who have had a colorectal adenoma are likely to develop a metachronous adenoma and therefore need to be kept under surveillance. It is essential to avoid unnecessary examinations by tailoring the frequency of follow up examinations to individual risk.

Methods: A total of 3134 patients undergoing endoscopic removal of colorectal adenomas were prospectively recorded on the Erlangen Registry of Colorectal Polyps between 1978 and 1996. A multivariate analysis of 1159 patients on long term follow up was performed to identify risk factors determining surveillance intervals for patients with metachronous adenomas of advanced pathology—that is, adenomas >10 mm or with high grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma.

Results: Univariate analysis revealed that sex, parental history of colorectal carcinoma, and characteristics of the initial findings—that is, size, multiplicity, and amount of villous structure—were significant predictors of metachronous adenomas of advanced pathology. On the basis of multivariate analysis, two risk groups were identified: (1) patients with no parental history of colorectal carcinoma with only small (<=10 mm) tubular adenomas at the initial clearing examination have a very low risk, and we estimated that 10% will develop advanced metachronous adenomas after 10 years; (2) the high risk group contained all other patients, 10% of whom will show metachronous adenomas of advanced pathology at follow up after only three years.

Conclusions: The risk of developing metachronous adenomas with advanced pathology can be stratified for various patient and adenoma characteristics. Surveillance intervals can be scheduled for low risk (10 years) and high risk (three years) patients. Risk related follow up thus helps to avoid unnecessary examinations.


Keywords: colorectal adenoma; surveillance intervals; colorectal polypectomy

Abbreviations: ERCRP, Erlangen Registry of Colorectal Polyps; OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk; NPS, National Polyp Study




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. O. Laiyemo, G. Murphy, P. S. Albert, L. B. Sansbury, Z. Wang, A. J. Cross, P. M. Marcus, B. Caan, J. R. Marshall, P. Lance, et al.
Postpolypectomy Colonoscopy Surveillance Guidelines: Predictive Accuracy for Advanced Adenoma at 4 Years
Ann Intern Med, March 18, 2008; 148(6): 419 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
Y. Yamaji, T. Mitsushima, H. Yoshida, H. Watabe, M. Okamoto, R. Wada, H. Ikuma, T. Kawabe, and M. Omata
The Malignant Potential of Freshly Developed Colorectal Polyps According to Age
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2006; 15(12): 2418 - 2421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
E. Lanza, T. J. Hartman, P. S. Albert, R. Shields, M. Slattery, B. Caan, E. Paskett, F. Iber, J. W. Kikendall, P. Lance, et al.
High Dry Bean Intake and Reduced Risk of Advanced Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence among Participants in the Polyp Prevention Trial
J. Nutr., July 1, 2006; 136(7): 1896 - 1903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
S. J. Winawer, A. G. Zauber, R. H. Fletcher, J. S. Stillman, M. J. O'Brien, B. Levin, R. A. Smith, D. A. Lieberman, R. W. Burt, T. R. Levin, et al.
Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance after Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.
CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2006; 56(3): 143 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
E. M. Kamel, M. Thumshirn, K. Truninger, M. Schiesser, M. Fried, B. Padberg, D. Schneiter, S. J. Stoeckli, G. K. von Schulthess, and K. D.M. Stumpe
Significance of Incidental 18F-FDG Accumulations in the Gastrointestinal Tract in PET/CT: Correlation with Endoscopic and Histopathologic Results
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2004; 45(11): 1804 - 1810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
Y Yamaji, T Mitsushima, H Ikuma, H Watabe, M Okamoto, T Kawabe, R Wada, H Doi, and M Omata
Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas estimated by annually repeated colonoscopies on asymptomatic Japanese
Gut, April 1, 2004; 53(4): 568 - 572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
POEM: Single, small adenoma low risk for recurrent colon polyps
BMJ, January 25, 2003; 326(7382): 0 - 0.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology