Gut

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ajaj, W
Right arrow Articles by Lauenstein, T C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ajaj, W
Right arrow Articles by Lauenstein, T C
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
Gut 2003;52:1738-1743
© 2003 by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology


COLON CANCER

Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology

W Ajaj, G Pelster, U Treichel, F M Vogt, J F Debatin, S G Ruehm, T C Lauenstein

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital, Essen, Germany

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr W Ajaj
Hufelandstr 55, Essen 45122, Germany; waleed.ajaj{at}uni-essen.de


ABSTRACT
Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and usefulness of a new magnetic resonance (MR) colonography technique for the detection of colorectal pathology in comparison with conventional colonoscopy as the standard of reference.

Patients and methods: A total of 122 subjects with suspected colorectal disease underwent "dark lumen" MR colonography. A contrast enhanced T1w three dimensional VIBE sequence was collected after rectal administration of water. The presence of colorectal masses and inflammatory lesions were documented. Results were compared with those of a subsequently performed colonoscopy.

Results: MR colonography was found to be accurate regarding detection of clinically relevant colonic lesions exceeding 5 mm in size, with sensitivity and specificity values of 93%/100%.

Conclusion: Dark lumen MR colonography can be considered as a promising alternative method for the detection of colorectal disease. In addition, it allows assessment of extraluminal organs.


Keywords: colorectal masses; conventional colonoscopy; inflammatory bowel disease; magnetic resonance imaging; virtual colonoscopy

Abbreviations: MR, magnetic resonance; MRC, MR colonography; CT, computed tomography; ROI, regions of interest; CNR, contrast to noise ratios


Relevant Article

The virtuosity of virtuality or how real is virtual colonography
H Herfarth and A G Schreyer
Gut 2003 52: 1662-1664. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Florie, E. Birnie, R. E. van Gelder, S. Jensch, B. Haberkorn, J. F. Bartelsman, A. van der Sluys Veer, P. Snel, V. P. M. van der Hulst, G. J. Bonsel, et al.
MR Colonography with Limited Bowel Preparation: Patient Acceptance Compared with That of Full-Preparation Colonoscopy
Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 150 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
C. A Kuehle, J. Langhorst, S. C Ladd, T. Zoepf, M. Nuefer, F. Grabellus, J. Barkhausen, G. Gerken, and T. C Lauenstein
Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population
Gut, August 1, 2007; 56(8): 1079 - 1085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Florie, S. Jensch, R. A. J. Nievelstein, J. F. Bartelsman, L. C. Baak, R. E. van Gelder, B. Haberkorn, A. van Randen, M. M. van der Ham, P. Snel, et al.
MR Colonography with Limited Bowel Preparation Compared with Optical Colonoscopy in Patients at Increased Risk for Colorectal Cancer
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 122 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
B A MacKalski and C N Bernstein
New diagnostic imaging tools for inflammatory bowel disease
Gut, May 1, 2006; 55(5): 733 - 741.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
A G Schreyer and R Kikinis
Combined PET/CT colonography: is this the way forward?
Gut, January 1, 2006; 55(1): 10 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Hartmann, B. Bassler, D. Schilling, H. E. Adamek, R. Jakobs, B. Pfeifer, A. Eickhoff, C. Zindel, J. F. Riemann, and G. Layer
Colorectal Polyps: Detection with Dark-Lumen MR Colonography versus Conventional Colonoscopy
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 238(1): 143 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. A. Kuehle, P. Veit, G. Antoch, F. Grabellus, P. Robert, T. Beyer, and C. U. Herborn
Contrast-Enhanced Dark Lumen PET/CT and MR Colonography in a Rodent Polyp Model: Initial Results with Histopathologic Correlation
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 1045 - 1047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
V L Jardine, E Sala, and D J Lomas
MR colonography: baseline appearance of the unprepared rectosigmoid
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2005; 78(927): 202 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Ajaj, T. C. Lauenstein, G. Pelster, G. Holtmann, S. G. Ruehm, J. F. Debatin, and S. C. Goehde
MR Colonography in Patients with Incomplete Conventional Colonoscopy
Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 452 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
H Herfarth and A G Schreyer
The virtuosity of virtuality or how real is virtual colonography
Gut, December 1, 2003; 52(12): 1662 - 1664.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology