Gut

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, P
Right arrow Articles by Sidorenko, E I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, P
Right arrow Articles by Sidorenko, E I
Gut 2005;54:i27-i32
© 2005 by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology

Are screening and surveillance for Barrett’s oesophagus really worthwhile?

P Sharma1, E I Sidorenko2

1 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas School of Medicine and VA Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
2 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr P Sharma
Division of Gastroenterology,VA Medical Center, 4801 E. Linwood Boulevard, Kansas City, Missouri, MO 64128, USA; psharma{at}kumc.edu


ABSTRACT
Oesophageal adenocarcinoma has a low incidence and still remains an uncommon cancer; however, it has been on the rise over the past 20 years. Barrett’s oesophagus, a complication of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, is the only known precursor of this adenocarcinoma. It can often be asymptomatic and probably goes undiagnosed in the majority of the population. There are no direct data supporting the practice of screening for Barrett’s oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma among the general population or even in patients with chronic reflux symptoms. However, many argue that the detection of neoplasms at a curable state in a high risk population can perhaps justify screening endoscopy. No prospective, controlled trials have been conducted to support the effectiveness of surveillance, but some indirect evidence does exist. The cost effectiveness of surveillance programmes needs to be further assessed in prospective studies. Ultimately, the use of better tools to diagnose Barrett’s oesophagus and dysplasia and the identification of high risk groups for progression to oesophageal adenocarcinoma could potentially make screening and surveillance a cost effective practice.


Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; GORD, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; HGD, high grade dysplasia; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; PDT, photodynamic therapy

Keywords: Barrett’s oesophagus; adenocarcinoma; screening




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. A. Risques, T. L. Vaughan, X. Li, R. D. Odze, P. L. Blount, K. Ayub, J. L. Gallaher, B. J. Reid, and P. S. Rabinovitch
Leukocyte Telomere Length Predicts Cancer Risk in Barrett's Esophagus
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2007; 16(12): 2649 - 2655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DTBHome page
Dilemmas in managing Barrett's oesophagus
DTB, September 1, 2006; 44(9): 69 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
P Malfertheiner and U Peitz
The interplay between Helicobacter pylori, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and intestinal metaplasia
Gut, March 1, 2005; 54(suppl_1): i13 - i20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology