Gut

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 4 December 2006. doi:10.1136/gut.2006.097543
Gut 2007;56:821-829
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow web only appendices
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
gut.2006.097543v1
56/6/821    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, E. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, E. J

PANCREAS AND BILIARY TRACT

Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice

Earl J Williams1, Steve Taylor2, Peter Fairclough3, Adrian Hamlyn4, Richard F Logan5, Derrick Martin6,1, Stuart A Riley7, Peter Veitch8,2, Mark Wilkinson9, Paula J Williamson2, Martin Lombard1 on behalf of participating units, BSG Audit of ERCP

1 Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
2 Centre for Medical Statistics and Health Evaluation, School of Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
3 Department of Gastroenterology, Barts and The London NHS Trust, London, UK
4 Department of Gastroenterology, Russell’s Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK
5 Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
6 Department of Radiology, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
7 Department of Gastroenterology, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
8 Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
9 Department of Gastroenterology, Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr M Lombard
Audit Steering Group, Department of Gastroenterology, 5z Link, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot St, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK; martin.lombard{at}rlbuht.nhs.uk


ABSTRACT
Objective: To examine endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) services and training in the UK.

Design: Prospective multicentre survey.

Setting: Five regions of England.

Participants: Hospitals with an ERCP unit.

Outcome measures: Adherence to published guidelines, technical success rates, complications and mortality.

Results: Organisation questionnaires were returned by 76 of 81 (94%) units. Personal questionnaires were returned by 190 of 213 (89%) ERCP endoscopists and 74 of 91 (81%) ERCP trainees, of whom 45 (61%) reported participation in <50 ERCPs per annum. In all, 66 of 81 (81%) units collected prospective data on 5264 ERCPs, over a mean period of 195 days. Oximetry was used by all units, blood pressure monitoring by 47 of 66 (71%) and ECG monitoring by 37 of 66 (56%) units; 1484 of 4521 (33%) patients were given >5 mg of midalozam. Prothrombin time was recorded in 4539 of 5264 (86%) procedures. Antibiotics were given in 1021 of 1412 (72%) cases, where indicated. Patients’ American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores were 3–5 in 670 of 5264 (12.7%) ERCPs, and 4932 of 5264 (94%) ERCPs were scheduled with therapeutic intent. In total, 140 of 182 (77%) trained endoscopists demonstrated a cannulation rate >=80%. The recorded cannulation rate among senior trainees (with an experience of >200 ERCPs) was 222/338 (66%). Completion of intended treatment was done in 3707 of 5264 (70.4%) ERCPs; 268 of 5264 (5.1%) procedures resulted in a complication. Procedure-related mortality was 21/5264 (0.4%). Mortality correlated with ASA score.

Conclusion: Most ERCPs in the UK are performed on low-risk patients with therapeutic intent. Complication rates compare favourably with those reported internationally. However, quality suffers because there are too many trainees in too many low-volume ERCP centres.


Abbreviations: ASA, American Society of Anesthesiology; BSG, British Society of Gastroenterology; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography; NCEPOD, National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
E J Williams, J Green, I Beckingham, R Parks, D Martin, and M Lombard
Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS)
Gut, July 1, 2008; 57(7): 1004 - 1021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Society of Gastroenterology