Article Text

Original article
Performance measures in three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening pilot
  1. S M Moss1,
  2. C Campbell2,
  3. J Melia1,
  4. D Coleman1,
  5. S Smith3,
  6. R Parker4,
  7. P Ramsell4,
  8. J Patnick5,
  9. D P Weller2
  1. 1Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Section of Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
  2. 2Centre for Population Health Sciences–General Practice, University of Edinburgh, Medical School, Edinburgh, UK
  3. 3Midlands & NW Bowel Cancer Screening Hub, University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire, NHS Trust, Coventry, Warwickshire, UK
  4. 4Bowel Cancer Screening Pilot, Ryde Ward, Rugby, UK
  5. 5NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, Fulwood House, Sheffield, UK
  1. Correspondence to S M Moss, Institute of Cancer Research, SRD Building, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK; sue.moss{at}icr.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives To compare performance measures across all three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening faecal occult blood test pilot and their relation to social deprivation and ethnicity.

Methods In each round in three primary care trusts, data for a restricted population of over 48 500 aged 60–69 years were analysed. Individual-based data included postcode linked to area-based data on the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2004, and ethnicity. Outcomes were the rates of screening and colonoscopy uptake, positivity and detection of neoplasia (adenomas or bowel cancer) and bowel cancer, and the positive predictive values (PPVs) of a positive test for neoplasia and bowel cancer. Sensitivity was calculated by the proportional incidence method using data on interval cancers identified from cancer registrations.

Results The overall uptake rate was 61.8%, 57.0% and 58.7% in the first, second and third rounds, respectively. Although the PPV for cancer decreased over the course of the three rounds (10.9% in the 1st round, 6.5% in 3rd round), the PPV for all neoplasia remained relatively constant (42.6% in 1st round, 36.9% in 3rd round). Deprivation and non-white ethnic background (principally Indian subcontinent in the pilot region) were associated with low screening and colonoscopy uptake rates, and this changed little over the three screening rounds. Uptake was lower in men, although differences in uptake between men and women decreased over time. Non-participation in previous rounds was a strong predictor of low uptake.

Conclusions Performance measures are commensurate with expectations in a screening programme reaching its third round of screening, but a substantial ongoing effort is needed, particularly to address the effects of deprivation and ethnicity in relation to uptake.

  • Colorectal cancer
  • screening

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

  • Online only appendix

    Files in this Data Supplement:

Footnotes

  • Funding NHS Cancer Screening Programmes.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • Digest
    Emad El-Omar Alexander Gerbes William Grady