Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Risk of cancer and acid suppressant treatment
  1. Michael Langman1,
  2. Richard Logan2
  1. 1Division of Medical Sciences, Medical School, University of Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
  2. 2Division of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Nottingham Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
    Professor M Langman
    Division of Medical Sciences, Medical School, University of Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK; m.j.s.langman{at}bham.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Garcia Rodriguez et al (Gut 2006;55:1538–44) use data from the General Practitioner Research Database (GPRD) to report that the odds ratios (ORs) for incidences of non-cardia gastric cancer were increased fourfold in those who received acid suppressant treatment for ulcer indications, compared with those who did not, and fivefold for oesophageal adenocarcinoma in those with oesophageal indications. They consider that the increased risks reflect the indications for treatment and not drug toxicity. Although their conclusions may be right, their data raise some important concerns.

The GPRD has particular strengths in recording prescriptions, but case details can be less complete, which may explain why 482 of the oesophageal cancer cases were excluded because of unspecified histology, leaving 287 with adenocarcinoma for comparison with their controls without cancer. The assumption that these …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

Linked Articles